Dr.
Joseph M. Miller DO
ROOT
Cause Supplements, LLC
_______________________________
Body
Fat and Inflammation Affect Colon Cancer Outcomes
Results
from a multicenter study
Study Objective
To
evaluate the association between body composition and related inflammatory
biomarkers with 5-year survival in patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer
Design
A
prospective, multicenter, translational cohort study using a retrospective
placebo comparison group
Participants
All
participants included in the study were diagnosed with nonmetastatic colon
cancer without underlying chronic inflammatory conditions. These patients were
not treated with anti-inflammatory medications.
All
participants underwent elective resection for colon cancer with curative
intent.
Study Parameters
Assessed
After
initial diagnosis, all patients were staged, and metastasis was ruled out using
standard imaging guidelines. Patients were followed with active surveillance
for 5 years, which included measurement of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA),
colonoscopy, and imaging studies.
Blood
samples were collected from patients preoperatively.
White
blood cell count and albumin levels were analyzed. Acute phase protein and
cytokine levels were measured and included interleukin 1b (IL-1b), IL-2, IL-10,
C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF).
CT
studies measured total fat area and subcutaneous fat area. Calculations for
visceral-to-total fat ratio and subcutaneous-to-total fat ratio were made.
CT
studies were also used to measure skeletal muscle area (SMA).
The
association of body composition profiles with 5-year cancer recurrence and
disease-specific mortality were analyzed using Mantel Cox log-rank test, and
Kaplan-Meier curves were produced.
When
specific composition profiles were significantly associated with poor clinical
and cancer outcomes, comparison of mean inflammatory mediator expression levels
was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test.
Primary Outcome
Measures
Associations
of body composition profiles with 5-year cancer recurrence and disease-specific
mortality
Key Findings
Overall
low skeletal muscle area (SMA) and high visceral-to-total fat ratio were
significantly associated with less favorable clinical and cancer outcomes.
Low
SMA was associated with a more than 2-fold increase in recurrence of colon
cancer in the 5-year postsurgical period (low SMA: hazard ratio [HR], 2.30 [95%
CI, 1.41–2.89]; P=0.04).
High
visceral-to-total fat ratio was significantly associated with developing a
cancer recurrence within the first 5 years after surgery (high
visceral-to-total fat ratio: HR, 5.78 [95% CI, 3.66–7.95]; P=0.02).
Low
SMA (OR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.85–5.36]; P=0.004) and high
visceral-to-total fat ratio (OR, 3.20 [95% CI, 1.85–10.84]; P=0.01)
were significantly associated with developing a 30-day infective complication.
High
visceral-to-total fat ratio was the only body composition profile significantly
associated with cancer-related mortality within the first 5 years after surgery
(HR, 5.92 [95% CI, 4.04–8.00]; P=0.02). There was no significant
association between low SMA and 5-year disease-specific mortality.
Patients
with low SMA who developed cancer recurrence, compared with those who did not,
had significantly higher levels of CRP, VEGF, and CD14 expression.
Patients
with high visceral-to-total fat ratio who developed recurrence, compared with
those who did not, had higher levels of IL-6 (mean [SD], 5.26 [7.05] ng/mL vs
2.76 [3.11] ng/mL; P=0.03) and TNFα (mean [SD], 5.74 [4.53] ng/mL
vs 4.50 [1.99] ng/mL; P=0.03).
Practice Implications
This
study showed an association between visceral fat and poorer outcomes, which is
not surprising. There is an accumulation of literature showing that visceral
fat is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, breast
cancer, and other chronic conditions.1 This study also
demonstrated the relationship between visceral fat and measurable inflammatory
mediators in the blood. In other studies, increased visceral fat has been
associated with the increased release of free fatty acids into portal
circulation, which results in insulin resistance and other metabolic syndromes.2 Conversely, subcutaneous fat correlated with increased
levels of IL-2 and IL-10, cytokines thought to possess predominantly
anti-inflammatory effects.
The
World Cancer Research Fund International lists 10 established obesity-related
cancers, including postmenopausal breast, endometrial, ovarian, advanced
prostate, colorectal, renal, pancreatic, liver, and gallbladder cancers and
esophageal adenocarcinoma.3 Clearly, obesity needs to be addressed
as 1 of the strategies in approaching these obesity-related cancers. However,
we must be mindful of how body fat is being assessed in our evaluation and
assessment of individuals.
Body
mass index (BMI), though recommended as an index of obesity and disease risk,
has its limitations. It is nonspecific, with only the weight and height used to
calculate BMI. There is no differentiation of muscle mass or any delineation of
visceral versus subcutaneous fat.4 Therefore, BMI
cannot predict the risks associated specifically with elevated levels of
visceral fat.
This
phenomenon is referred to as the ‘obesity paradox’ and is well-recognized in
the cardiometabolic literature but less so in oncology.
The common perception is that excess adiposity, approximated by
BMI, is associated with reduced cancer survival. However, several studies have
demonstrated that overweight and early obese states are associated with
improved survival. This phenomenon is referred to as the “obesity paradox” and
is well-recognized in the cardiometabolic literature but less so in oncology.3 This suggests
that BMI is not a reliable form of measurement or prognostic tool due to its
inability to evaluate fat deposition, particularly subcutaneous vs visceral
fat.3
Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) may be a better tool to consider when
evaluating patients who may be at increased risk for colon cancer recurrence or
morbidity related to colon cancer. WHR was found to be a better anthropometric
measurement compared to measuring waist circumference alone or BMI, for
assessing excess levels of visceral fat.5
Increased levels of subcutaneous fat and low skeletal muscle
area (SMA) were associated with increased levels of inflammatory mediators (ie,
IL-6, CRP, VEGF), which are known to promote cancer cell survival and
metastatic transformation.
Researchers have questioned whether targeted anti-inflammatory
therapies that work to inhibit IL-6 and other inflammatory mediators have a
role in modulating the inflammatory association of body composition with cancer
outcomes. Perioperative use of taurolidine, a taurine derivative, significantly
diminished circulating IL-6 levels for the first 7 days following surgical
resection in nonmetastatic colon cancer.6 Taurolidine has
been shown to inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokines, specifically TNF-alpha and
IL-6.7 Whether taurolidine affects outcomes was not part of that
study’s design.
Given the apparent role that high systemic inflammation plays in
poorer outcomes for cancers, an anti-inflammatory dietary approach should be
considered. A 2006 study observed an inverse association between fruit and
vegetable intake and CRP.8 Diets high in dietary fiber and
rich in fruits and vegetables are associated with lower CRP levels, while
consumption of a Western diet, high in fat, sugar, sodium, and refined grains,
has been correlated with elevated CRP levels.9 A 2004 study
found that adhering to a Mediterranean diet (rich in olive oil, fish, nuts,
seeds, fruits, and vegetables) lowered CRP levels by an average of 20 percent.10
Sleep hygiene and exercise can also be included as part of a
strategy to address concerns of higher systemic inflammation. CRP, IL-6, and
fibrinogen have been linked to sleep, with higher levels of these markers
associated with poorer sleep.11 More active
individuals involved in regular exercise have lower concentrations of IL‑6 and
CRP.12
The study reviewed here found unfavorable outcomes in
nonmetastatic colon cancer associated with body composition and increased
expression of proinflammatory pathways. These are important points that should
be acknowledged and addressed in the clinical setting. However, it is important
to note that this was a small cohort study involving only 28 patients. In
addition, men comprised 78.6% of the study participants, compared to women at
21.4%.